Current:Home > StocksHere's how each Supreme Court justice voted to decide the affirmative action cases -Mastery Money Tools
Here's how each Supreme Court justice voted to decide the affirmative action cases
View
Date:2025-04-13 16:10:33
The Supreme Court decided 6-3 and 6-2 that race-conscious admission policies of the University of North Carolina and Harvard College violate the Constitution, effectively bringing to an end to affirmative action in higher education through a decision that will reverberate across campuses nationwide.
The rulings fell along ideological lines. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority opinion for both cases, and Justice Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh wrote concurring opinions. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote a dissenting opinion. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has ties to Harvard and recused herself in that case, but wrote a dissent in the North Carolina case.
The ruling is the latest from the Supreme Court's conservative majority that has upended decades of precedent, including overturning Roe v. Wade in 2022.
- Read the full text of the decision
Here's how the justices split on the affirmative action cases:
Supreme Court justices who voted against affirmative action
The court's six conservatives formed the majority in each cases. Roberts' opinion was joined by Thomas, Samuel Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett. The chief justice wrote that Harvard and UNC's race-based admission guidelines "cannot be reconciled with the guarantees of the Equal Protection Clause."
"Respondents' race-based admissions systems also fail to comply with the Equal Protection Clause's twin commands that race may never be used as a 'negative' and that it may not operate as a stereotype," Roberts wrote. "The First Circuit found that Harvard's consideration of race has resulted in fewer admissions of Asian-American students. Respondents' assertion that race is never a negative factor in their admissions programs cannot withstand scrutiny. College admissions are zerosum, and a benefit provided to some applicants but not to others necessarily advantages the former at the expense of the latter. "
Roberts said that prospective students should be evaluated "as an individual — not on the basis of race," although universities can still consider "an applicant's discussion of how race affected his or her life, be it through discrimination, inspiration, or otherwise."
Supreme Court justices who voted to uphold affirmative action
The court's three liberals all opposed the majority's decision to reject race as a factor in college admissions. Sotomayor's dissent was joined by Justice Elena Kagan in both cases, and by Jackson in the UNC case. Both Sotomayor and Kagan signed onto Jackson's dissent as well.
Sotomayor argued that the admissions processes are lawful under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
"The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment enshrines a guarantee of racial equality," Sotomayor wrote. "The Court long ago concluded that this guarantee can be enforced through race-conscious means in a society that is not, and has never been, colorblind."
In her dissent in the North Carolina case, Jackson recounted the long history of discrimination in the U.S. and took aim at the majority's ruling.
"With let-them-eat-cake obliviousness, today, the majority pulls the ripcord and announces 'colorblindness for all' by legal fiat," Jackson wrote. "But deeming race irrelevant in law does not make it so in life."
Melissa Quinn contributed to this report.
- In:
- Affirmative Action
- Supreme Court of the United States
veryGood! (66653)
Related
- Working Well: When holidays present rude customers, taking breaks and the high road preserve peace
- Hacked-up bodies found inside coolers aboard trucks — along with warning message from Mexican cartel
- Margot Robbie Breaks Silence on Oscars Nomination Snub for Barbie Role
- Syphilis cases rise sharply in women as CDC reports an alarming resurgence nationwide
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- 4 NHL players charged with sexual assault in 2018 case, lawyers say
- Woman falls into dumpster while tossing garbage, gets compacted inside trash truck
- Jason and Travis Kelce Prove Taylor Swift is the Real MVP for Her “Rookie Year”
- What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
- 'Mr. & Mrs. Smith’: Release date, cast, how to watch new spy romance inspired by 2005 hit
Ranking
- Nearly 400 USAID contract employees laid off in wake of Trump's 'stop work' order
- Taiwan holds military drills to defend against the threat of a Chinese invasion
- Could Aldi be opening near Las Vegas? Proposal shows plans for Nevada's first location.
- Chita Rivera, revered and pioneering Tony-winning dancer and singer, dies at 91
- Global Warming Set the Stage for Los Angeles Fires
- Hacked-up bodies found inside coolers aboard trucks — along with warning message from Mexican cartel
- Joel Embiid leaves game, Steph Curry scores 37 as Warriors defeat 76ers
- Syphilis cases rise sharply in women as CDC reports an alarming resurgence nationwide
Recommendation
Civic engagement nonprofits say democracy needs support in between big elections. Do funders agree?
Mark Zuckerberg, Linda Yaccarino among tech CEOs grilled for failing to protect kids
Pregnant Ashley Benson Bares Nearly All in Topless Photo Shoot
Boeing declines to give a financial outlook as it focuses on quality and safety
Biden administration makes final diplomatic push for stability across a turbulent Mideast
Grammy Awards host Trevor Noah on why to tune in, being nominated and his post ‘Daily Show’ life
From marching bands to megastars: How the Super Bowl halftime show became a global spectacle
Justin Timberlake reveals he's 'been in the studio' with NSYNC following reunion