Current:Home > MarketsJustice Department reverses position, won't support shielding Trump in original E. Jean Carroll lawsuit -Mastery Money Tools
Justice Department reverses position, won't support shielding Trump in original E. Jean Carroll lawsuit
View
Date:2025-04-24 15:47:58
The Justice Department on Tuesday reversed its position that former President Donald Trump was shielded from a 2019 defamation lawsuit filed by the writer E. Jean Carroll.
The government had originally argued that Trump was protected from liability by the Westfall Act, because he was acting as a federal employee. Under the act, federal employees are entitled to absolute immunity from personal lawsuits for conduct occurring within the scope of their employment.
Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Brian Boynton wrote in a letter Tuesday to attorneys for Trump and Carroll that a jury's determination in a separate civil lawsuit that Trump was liable for sexual abuse and defamation of Carroll factored into the decision. That lawsuit was filed in November 2022 and involved statements Trump made after his presidency.
"The allegations that prompted the statements related to a purely personal incident: an alleged sexual assault that occurred decades prior to Mr. Trump's Presidency," Boynton wrote. "That sexual assault was obviously not job-related."
Carroll filed her first lawsuit in 2019, while Trump was still president — and after he accused her of "totally lying" when she said he sexually assaulted her in a high-end New York City department store in the 1990s. In October 2021, a federal judge in New York ruled that Trump was not shielded from Carroll's suit. In 2022, the 2nd Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals reversed the lower court's decision and suggested the Westfall Act could protect Trump from liability in the case.
The lawsuit has remained active and has yet to go to trial. After the jury found Trump liable in April, Carroll amended the suit, adding new defamation claims related to more recent statements made by Trump, and he filed a countersuit.
The Justice Department had initially argued that even though "the former president made crude and offensive comments in response to the very serious accusations of sexual assault" the law protecting employees like the president from such a lawsuit should be upheld.
But the Justice Department reviewed that decision after the jury in Carroll's second lawsuit in New York found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation, Boynton wrote. It concluded that Trump had not acted "out of a desire to serve the government" when he denied her claims.
Boynton also cited statements Trump has made about Carroll in the years since his presidency ended.
"These post-Presidency statements, which were not before the Department during the original scope certification in this case, tend to undermine the claim that the former President made very similar statements at issue in Carroll out of a desire to serve the government," Boynton wrote.
Carroll's attorney, Roberta Kaplan expressed gratitude for the department's reversal and said in a statement, "We have always believed that Donald Trump made his defamatory statements about our client in June 2019 out of personal animus, ill will, and spite, and not as President of the United States."
She added that "we look forward to trial in E Jean Carroll's original case in January 2024."
An attorney for Trump did not immediately return a request for comment.
- In:
- E. Jean Carroll
- Lawsuit
- Donald Trump
- New York
Graham Kates is an investigative reporter covering criminal justice, privacy issues and information security for CBS News Digital. Contact Graham at KatesG@cbsnews.com or grahamkates@protonmail.com
veryGood! (58)
Related
- Selena Gomez engaged to Benny Blanco after 1 year together: 'Forever begins now'
- 'We're reborn!' Gazans express joy at returning home to north
- Charges tied to China weigh on GM in Q4, but profit and revenue top expectations
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- The city of Chicago is ordered to pay nearly $80M for a police chase that killed a 10
- What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
- Warm inflation data keep S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq under wraps before Fed meeting next week
- Warm inflation data keep S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq under wraps before Fed meeting next week
- Bodycam footage shows high
- 'Vanderpump Rules' star DJ James Kennedy arrested on domestic violence charges
Ranking
- 2 killed, 3 injured in shooting at makeshift club in Houston
- Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
- Average rate on 30
- McKinsey to pay $650 million after advising opioid maker on how to 'turbocharge' sales
- Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
- A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
- The Super Bowl could end in a 'three
- San Francisco names street for Associated Press photographer who captured the iconic Iwo Jima photo
Recommendation
Alex Murdaugh’s murder appeal cites biased clerk and prejudicial evidence
Biden administration makes final diplomatic push for stability across a turbulent Mideast
Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
Hackers hit Rhode Island benefits system in major cyberattack. Personal data could be released soon
New data highlights 'achievement gap' for students in the US
Questlove charts 50 years of SNL musical hits (and misses)
What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
'Squid Game' without subtitles? Duolingo, Netflix encourage fans to learn Korean