Current:Home > InvestAppeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight -Mastery Money Tools
Appeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight
View
Date:2025-04-14 22:14:35
Washington — A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., rejected a request by former President Donald Trump to reconsider an order limiting what he can say about his criminal case related to the aftermath of the 2020 election, setting up a potential Supreme Court fight over the matter.
In a short unsigned order issued Tuesday, the judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied Trump's request that they take up the dispute over the gag order "en banc," meaning in front of the full court. A three-judge panel largely upheld the gag order in December, allowing Trump to request a review by the full appeals court.
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is overseeing the case brought by special counsel Jack Smith against Trump in Washington, issued an order in October at the request of Smith that barred Trump from making inflammatory remarks targeting Smith, his staff, court personnel and possible witnesses who may be called to testify in the case.
The three-judge panel upheld most of Chutkan's order, ruling that Trump cannot target potential witnesses or speak publicly about any lawyers involved in the case — except Smith himself — or their families. However, Trump can continue criticizing the Biden administration and the Justice Department, and can claim that Smith's prosecution is politically motivated.
Tuesday's order denying Trump's appeal indicated the decision was unanimous, with no judges requesting a vote on the matter. Trump's attorneys had previously indicated that they would likely take the matter to the Supreme Court if the appeals court did not rule in their favor.
CBS News has reached out to Trump's campaign for comment.
In the December order, the three judges — Patricia Millett, Cornelia Pillard and Bradley Garcia — said they agreed with Chutkan that some aspects of Trump's public comments "pose a significant and imminent threat" to the integrity of the ongoing criminal prosecution, "warranting a speech-constraining protective order."
But the judges also said the order put in place by Chutkan "sweeps in more protected speech than is necessary" and struck down portions of the restrictions, including those that prevented Trump from publicly speaking about Smith.
Trump was charged with four counts related to alleged efforts to prevent the transfer of presidential power after the 2020 election. He has pleaded not guilty and denied all wrongdoing.
The former president's legal team argued that any gag order infringed on Trump's right to free speech, especially on the campaign trail, and linked his outspoken criticism about the special counsel's criminal case to his bid to return to the White House. Smith's team, however, contended that some of Trump's public comments and social media posts jeopardized a fair trial and the security of those involved.
The trial was originally scheduled for March, but the case is on hold as the appeals court considers Trump's separate claim of presidential immunity from prosecution. Chutkan rejected that argument last year and ruled that while all trial deadlines are paused, the restrictions of the gag order remain in effect as the appeals process plays out.
Robert LegareRobert Legare is a CBS News multiplatform reporter and producer covering the Justice Department, federal courts and investigations. He was previously an associate producer for the "CBS Evening News with Norah O'Donnell."
veryGood! (2266)
Related
- Skins Game to make return to Thanksgiving week with a modern look
- South Dakota tribe bans governor from reservation over US-Mexico border remarks
- Senate Democrats face steep odds in trying to hold majority in November
- California bald eagles care for 3 eggs as global fans root for successful hatching
- At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
- Powell: Federal Reserve on track to cut rates this year with inflation slowing and economy healthy
- Taylor Swift Drops Reputation Easter Eggs With Must-See 2024 Grammys Look
- Grammys 2024: Paris Jackson Covers Up 80+ Tattoos For Unforgettable Red Carpet Moment
- FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
- Why Jason Kelce Thinks the NFL Should Continue to Show Taylor Swift on TV Game Broadcasts
Ranking
- Dick Vitale announces he is cancer free: 'Santa Claus came early'
- The destruction of a Jackie Robinson statue was awful. What happened next was amazing.
- Taking the SAT in March? No need to sharpen a pencil
- What's going on at the border? A dramatic standoff between Texas and the White House.
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- Lionel Messi effect: Inter Miami sells out Hong Kong Stadium for Saturday practice
- What Vision Zero Has And Hasn't Accomplished
- How Euphoria's Colman Domingo Met His Husband Through Craigslist
Recommendation
This was the average Social Security benefit in 2004, and here's what it is now
NFL takes flag football seriously. Pro Bowl highlights growing sport that welcomes all
Suburban Chicago police fatally shoot domestic violence suspect
Are you happy? New film follows a Bhutan bureaucrat who asks 148 questions to find out
Angelina Jolie nearly fainted making Maria Callas movie: 'My body wasn’t strong enough'
Grammys Mistakenly Name Nicki Minaj and Ice Spice's Barbie World As Best Rap Song Winner
Oklahoma jarred by 5.1 magnitude earthquake
Auburn star apologizes to Morgan Freeman after thinking actor was Ole Miss fan trying to rattle him